black history month 09 Black History – My White ExperienceBadGalsRadio is sponsoring a Black History Month blog carnival. Take a look and submit your entry. There are many categories available.


Here is my entry.

Being a white European, when I arrived in the United States in the middle of the ’60s the widely accepted term for African Americans was Negro. That term of course still keeps popping up every time we hear the “A mind is a terrible thing to waste” slogan from the United Negro College Fund. Some time later, probably sometime in the 70s the more widely accepted “black” made its inroads into our society. The presently used African American designation, although obviously correct and proper seems just a tiny bit pompous to me. I am quite happy to be called “white” for instance and certainly do not insist in being termed a European American,

Fortunately, not everyone insists on the African American label and many of my friends refer to themselves as “black” and I know that they do not do it just for my benefit, but because it just seems natural to them. At the same time, I hear blacks referring to each other by the dreaded “N” word. Could someone explain what this is all about?

I have also been wondering how the black, white, or whatever designation really holds. For example, Tiger Woods has described himself as a “cablinasian” and not black. Barack Obama is half black and half white and has been raised by white people, but he is still called an African American. I know people, whose racial and genetic background is obviously very mixed. Anything from a half and half white and black combination, to a black, white, Asian and American Indian background and even in the case of those, who’s black genes appear to be in a definite minority (no pun intended) they still are considered as being African American.

This seems to be an almost uniquely American way of handling things. Those, who have spent some time in Latin America, have probably noticed that the populations in many of those countries are of a very racially mixed variety. There are terms for these combinations. For instance: A mulatto is a person of black and white ancestry. A mestizo is a person of a white and Indian blood and so forth.

We never seem to use those terms here in the U.S. Are they insulting to some? I don’t believe that they need to be perceived in that way.

In short: I assume that it really is the case of each particular person’s preference. If one feels that racially and culturally he, or she is black, that should be the determining factor. And the same holds for whites, Asians and others. The important thing is that this should indeed be each person’s choice and not a formalized, pseudo-scientific and/or bureaucratic mandate. After all, these were the tools that slavers, racists and others have used in the past and now, especially after January 20, 2009 we are way beyond that. Or are we?

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Tagged with:

Filed under: Black HistoryHuman RightsU.S. Politicsracism

Like this post? Subscribe to my RSS feed and get loads more!