We have all heard of lobbyists, both from “good” and “bad” organizations, companies and trade associations roaming through the halls of Congress and pretty much everywhere, trying to further their myriad economic, social and political agendas.

Those who still watch TV network news are very familiar with all kinds of erectile dysfunction drugs, arthritis, asthma, mental disorder, prostate, stomach, bladder, toe nail and other kinds of remedies offered by large pharmaceutical companies.

A lot of these drugs are found later to be downright deadly and pulled from the shelves, but until that time, they are perfectly able to bring billions to their manufacturers. After all, in most cases a huge part of the research leading to the development of many drugs is funded directly by government research grants and not really by the manufacturers, who have the gall of offering pills, costing them pennies for an often-exorbitant price. The Big Pharma excuses usually refer to “development costs”, indeed, those same costs, which you the taxpayer have already borne by paying for the research grants.

But lets not forget those expensive drug commercials during the network news, or multi-page ads in newspapers and magazines – those supremely annoying page-after-page ads, which contain warnings and disclaimers in fine print. Don’t be fooled for a minute that this information is meant as a “public service”. What it really amounts to is: “we warned you ahead of time, so if the drug damages your body, or kills you, you have been forewarned and shouldn’t sue us”.

This is not to say that all drugs are dangerous, or bad for you. There are some that actually help people, or cure them of all kinds of diseases. The lowly, inexpensive aspirin comes to mind, along with some antibiotics and some of the statin drugs (which should be used with care, in our opinion).

There is also no doubt that most drugs – at least those sold and pushed in the U.S. are way overpriced, others are way overused and others – at least according to Big Pharma-are actually underused.

That’s why you see so many of those drug ads and commercials and that is why that the big and even small pharmaceutical companies employ legions of sales representatives – not necessarily in the halls of Congress, but in physician’s offices, medical schools, publishing houses and everywhere their presence is deemed to be necessary for the financial well being of their companies.

How many of you have noticed the usually attractive, well-dressed women and men, towing roller cases through buildings housing “doctors’” offices? They seem to be ever-present. How about the reps bringing in catered lunches to the physician’s offices on a regular basis? Leaving tons of samples of their products, so the physicians can use them themselves, give them free of charge to their family members, or friends and to their patients?

Lets not be gullible and think that the samples and the lunches are given out of the goodness of the Big Pharma’s “hearts”. How about the exotic trips, golf vacations, dinners and gifts of all sorts?

Its is a nice, comfortable arrangement for many “doctors”, who in return for all of these favors often prescribe the drugs pushed by the reps, instead of treating their patients with the best (and often cheaper) of the available medicines.

At the same time, several university medical centers such as Yale have barred drug company sales reps from bringing free lunches to staff physicians. Yale might have been motivated to do so by the ‘C’ grade it received from the American Medical Student Association, a national group that rates how well medical schools monitor and control drug industry money.

We wonder if this trend will flourish and eventually bring about a ban throughout the medical industry. Frankly, we doubt it, as the whole shtick is much too comfy and profitable for all of the beneficiaries of such practices. This is corruption on a grand scale.

In the meantime, expect for the medical and drug expenses to continue climbing out of sight and to continue paying through the nose for health care, whether the Democrats manage to push the health care reform through, or not.

Technorati Tags: ads, Big Pharma, commercials, dinners, Drugs, free lunches, gifts, golf vacations, sales reps, Unethical Game

There is little doubt that without finally solving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict we can probably forget about ending all kinds of jihads, anti-western and anti-American conflicts and movements and can comfortably continue to wage Bush’s “war on terror” for the foreseeable future.

Here is a fragment of one of Washington Post’s Tuesday editorials:” THE OBAMA administration appears near to a diplomatic achievement it expected long ago: the relaunch of negotiations between Israelis and Palestinians. It will be a modest start – not a big conference or a convocation to Camp David but “proximity talks,” in which envoy George J. Mitchell will shuttle between the two camps. This is, in one sense, a step backward for Israeli-Palestinian relations, since the two sides have been talking directly to each other, off and on, since 1991. But Mr. Mitchell says he hopes his brokering will quickly lead to direct talks, and the administration believes that even this stunted process will be better than none at all.”

At the same time, Vice President Biden strongly criticized Israel on Tuesday for approving construction of 1,600 new housing units in the eastern part of Jerusalem, a decision announced a day after Israeli leaders and the Palestinians agreed to U.S.-mediated, indirect peace negotiations.

This is not the first time Israel has been criticized for building and expanding Jewish settlements on occupied Arab land. Both the U.N. Security Council and the General Assembly have passed well over 100 resolutions concerning Israel. Practically all of them went unheeded and any and all attempts to sanction Israel have been blocked by the United States. Those are facts and not commentary.

As a matter of fact, between 1967 and 2000, Iraq was the subject of 69 U.N. Security Council resolutions. By comparison, Israel, our closest “ally” in the Middle East, has been the subject of 138 resolutions. Not surprisingly, most of those resolutions call upon Israel to comply with basic principles of international law embodied by the UN Charter. Many of them condemn actions taken by Israel and call upon Israel on more than one occasion to comply with previous resolutions that Israel ignored and continues to ignore to this day.

This is not to say that the Palestinian side is totally blameless in this quagmire, but according to international law, the occupying power must assure the safety and well being of the population living under its occupation. Through Resolution No. 237, the U.N. Security Council called upon Israel to “ensure the safety, welfare and security of the inhabitants, facilitate the return of those inhabitants who have fled the areas since the outbreak of the hostilities and recommends the scrupulous respect of the humanitarian principles contained in the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949.” In subsequent resolutions, the Security Council deplored Israel for the delay in its implementation of Resolution 237. Yet, Israel continued to defy the world community, including the United States. The Security Council, in the face of Israel’s defiance, passed no less than five subsequent resolutions demanding that Israel comply but to this day the defiance continues.

This appears to be the crux of the matter. The whole issue does not seem to be just the fact of Israel existing as such, but the continuing occupation of the West Bank, the whole road, security and utility infrastructure built and maintained mostly to serve and secure the Jewish settlements. As of November 2009, approximately 400,000 Israelis lived in the 168 officially recognized settlements in the West Bank, and 280,000 Israelis lived in East Jerusalem. Every time we open a paper, still another settlement is about to be enlarged, or a new one built.

The latest problems and latest clashes have erupted in Hebron, after Israel’s decision to add Hebron’s Cave of the Patriarchs and Rachel’s Tomb in Bethlehem to Israel’s list of national heritage sites.

The sites are holy to both Jews and Muslims.

To make a long story short: For the benefit of Israel, the Palestinians and indeed the entire world, time is running short on actually coming to the negotiating table in earnest, to be ready to compromise, if needed – and lots of that, in addition to an open mind and a lot more good will be necessary – and finally agree on a workable framework, which will lead to a long-overdue Israeli-Palestinian agreement. We can only hope that this day will actually come soon, because the simmering conflict has already spread its tentacles worldwide and nobody, but nobody in his right mind needs, or wants still another war.

Technorati Tags: Biden, israel, Jewish settlements, Mitchell, negotiations, occupation, palestinians, peace, talks

The present British Prime Minister Gordon Brown said it was right to go to war, also saying that the United States dismissed warnings of chaos and violence once Saddam Hussein was toppled.  Brown testified for over four hours before a public inquiry panel about Britain’s role in the conflict and its aftermath.

Defending his role in the conflict, but at the same time cautious not to inflame tensions over the unpopular war ahead of a looming national election campaign, Brown said joining the 2003 U.S.-led invasion was a tough call.

“We have got to recognize that war may be necessary, but it is also tragic in the effect it has on people’s lives,” said Brown, who voted – like most British lawmakers – to approve Britain’s role in the war.

“These were difficult decisions. I believe they were the right decisions for the right reasons,” he said.

But he was critical of U.S. planning, saying American officials failed to heed warnings about the need for clarity on how to protect and govern Iraq in the aftermath of the invasion.

Unlike Tony Blair, who defiantly stood by the invasion and argued Saddam was a threat to the entire world; Brown said he believed the war was justified because Baghdad had breached international rules in failing to abide by U.N. resolutions.

If you do some searching, you will find that a number of countries, including the main U.S. ally in the Middle East have also failed to abide by a whole slew of U.N. resolutions. Nevertheless, the “coalition” has not invaded those countries.

Brown insisted that Iraq had posed the first serious test to the post-Cold War world, claiming that any failure to depose the Iraqi leader would have emboldened other dictators and stirred global tensions.

Brown also sought to distance himself from President George W. Bush, suggesting their relations were “amicable” and criticizing the doctrine of some members of Bush’s administration.

“I never subscribed to what you might call the neo-conservative proposition that somehow, at the barrel of a gun, overnight, liberty or democracy could be conjured up,” Brown told the panel.

Hard to believe that either Brown, or Blair could actually believe in the crud they were spewing. It was without a doubt still another case of justifying their crimes and of covering their well-fed asses.

Technorati Tags: Britain, defend, Gordon Brown, Iraq invasion, Tony Blair

From top left: Kue Bui for Newsweek; Andrew Hetherington / Redux; James Keyser / Time Life Pictures-Getty Images; Richard A. Bloom / Corbis; Ahmad Al-Rubaye / AFP-Gettty Images; Brendan Hoffman / Getty Images

Newsweek magazine has a very interesting and lengthy article, entitled “The Return of the Neocons” by David Margolick.

Here’s a short excerpt: “One prominent activist on the libertarian end of the party – who hates what he sees as their costly foreign – policy adventurism and the GOP electoral losses (i.e., the presidency and both houses of Congress) he attributes to them – calls them ‘parasites’: with little electoral power of their own, he claims, they have had to attach themselves to others, like George W. Bush. Comfortably ensconced behind a cloak of anonymity, he bristles, but also marvels, at their endurance and effectiveness, comparing them to ‘an infection that keeps coming back.’ “They’ve perfected this absolutely incredible thing: they announce who they are, how powerful they are, how influential they are, and get people to write articles about them,” he says. “But when their policies are perceived to have caused mass chaos, they don’t exist, they didn’t have anything to do with it, they weren’t there, and they get really snotty. And anyone who attacks them is anti-Semitic.”

Worth a read we think.

Technorati Tags: neocons, Newsweek, return

Ronald Reagan and his Merrill Lynch Treasury Secretary Donald Regan

Reagan and Bush 41 quadrupled the national debt in only 12 years. Bush 43 doubled it again in only eight. It is now 10 times higher than it was in 1980 when Reagan was elected.

The hero of the conservatives, Ronald Reagan begun an era in which a small minority grew vastly rich, while working families saw only meager gains. He also broke with longstanding rules of fiscal prudence. While the taxes on the super-rich went as high as 90 percent in the past – still leaving them more than enough for a lavish lifestyle – the so-called “trickle down Reaganomics” lowered those taxes by about two-thirds. The rhetoric of course emphasized the tax benefits for the average Americans, who were ostensibly the beneficiaries of those policies.

All of this, while the Regan administration kept preaching about “small government, free markets and democracy”.

Those who actually believed in the above Reagan TV commercial should be seriously surprised that the Federal debt as a percentage of GDP fell steadily from the end of World War II until 1980, rising for the first time in decades under Reagan and Bush 41, falling under Clinton and rising again under Bush 43.

Even though some people like to portray the Reagan legacy as an anti-communist success story, Reagan’s biggest legacy was the change in America’s financial rules.

Let’s start with the tax cuts for the rich, following with turning the federal retirement from a Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS) to the Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS). The former was (and still is for some long-time federal employees), a pension system, based on years of service and FERS consists basically of the Thrift Savings Plan (TSP), a 401k setup, in which untold billions of federal worker’s retirement funds get largely invested in various Wall Street schemes every two weeks. It was in effect an enormous gift for the Wall Street apparatus, while depriving millions of government employees of a viable retirement option.

At the same time, the Reagan administration deprived the Americans of the ability to deduct interest payments for anything not directly related to their primary real estate holdings.

This of course has started the epidemic of rising household debt.

Lets not forget the super-costly S&L crisis, brought about by Reagan’s deregulation.

Lets not blame poor Ronnie for everything. After all, he only started the ball rolling, even though it was in a very big way. As you probably realize by now he was only the front for all of the shady financial “wizards”, who relentlessly continue their lobbying and machinations to the present time.

The next really big breakthrough in their efforts came with the Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000 or CFMA (H.R. 5660 and S.3283), which in fact removed regulations of all kinds of financial crookery (called “products” by the industry) and which has returned the U.S. stock markets to the days before the 1907 Wall Street crash – in reality to legalized betting, which happens to be illegal outside of Wall Street. It was Bill Clinton, who towards the end of his second term signed this bill.

Let’s also not forget Enron and a whole bunch of other events, for which nobody has really gotten punished in any meaningful way.

Lets not forget Greenspan, Rubin, Summers and others, who continue to play important roles in our economy.

And don’t for a minute forget the fact that former and present Goldman Sachs executives are sprinkled throughout both the government and our financial system, continuing in their unrelenting mission.

Technorati Tags: bush, clinton, Economy, goldman sachs, greenspan, Reagan, reganomics, Rubin, summers, takeover, US, wall street